ROSEN & OHR, P.A.
HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA

Our Law Firm Mission and Goals Our mission is to provide our clients with professional, zealous, and effective representation. Every person we represent can expect the full focus of our firm, and that the case will be managed carefully and competently. We focus on serving clients first, confident that our high level of personal service is the starting point for a successful case. Our lawyers and staff work hard to provide the representation you deserve. We never give up the legal fight for our clients. The skilled and experienced South Florida attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and support staff with our firm work as a team to aggressively pursue the compensation or benefits you deserve after a serious injury. Ronald is also active in his community doing volunteer work over the years for the American Cancer Society, as well as for local civic and religious organizations which included serving as president of the Hollywood Lakes Section Civic Association, parliamentarian of Temple Sinai, and chairman of Super Sunday fundraising for the South Broward Jewish Federation. He has also helped by serving meals at local churches. Ron looks forward to many more years of serving others in law by utilizing his vast experience and extensive knowledge of the law to provide outstanding legal representation and exceptional personal service. He is grateful for the opportunity and role he has had in representing others in Our Mission Mission Statement Our mission is to provide our clients with dedicated, professional, zealous, and loyal legal representation using thorough preparation, experience, and expertise. Our focus is on serving our clients first, realizing that everything else will follow from there. Always act honestly and with integrity, doing what we say we will do. from the vehicle in which our client was a passenger. Our law firm then went forward and was successful in obtaining a settlement of an additional $2,275,000.00 from the tractor trailer driver, who by contact forced the vehicle that hit our client head on, across the median. There were no witnesses to the initial impact between the vehicle that struck our client’s vehicle head-on and the tractor-trailer. Through expert testimony, our firm was able to show that the driver of the tractor-trailer was untruthful and as a result, we were able to collect the additional $2,275,000.00 from the driver. Following a four day Jury trial, our firm obtained a jury verdict in excess of $682,733 on a that took place at the client’s apartment complex. Our clients lived at the apartment complex for several years before this slip and fall incident occurred and the insurance company for the apartment complex argued that our client should have known that the floors were slippery and also argued that it was our client’s flip flop sandals that caused her to fall. Our firm immediately hired a building code expert and engineer to investigate the scene of the fall. Mr. Rosen and Mr. Ohr presented their clients’ case to the insurance company and defense lawyer at a mediation using an iPad and a wireless overhead projector to strategically demonstrate to the insurance company what Mr. Rosen and Mr. Ohr planned to show the jury at trial. After Rosen and Ohr’s presentation, the insurance company’s outlook on the case changed drastically and they paid our clients $250,000.00 prior to trial. . After getting the insurance company to provide our client with medical treatment and other benefits for over 10 years, Mr. Rosen and Mr. Ohr fought to get our client a fair and reasonable settlement. Fortunately, our client’s injuries did not prevent her from being able to work following her accident. Although the Employer and insurance company argued our client’s case wasn’t worth much because she was still able to work as a bus driver, we were able to reach a settlement for our client in the amount of $275,000.00. Our firm represented the family of a 26-year-old wife and mother of two children who decided for safety reasons to have four wisdom teeth pulled at Hollywood Memorial Hospital rather than at her oral surgeon’s office. The hospital had an operating suite consisting of eight operating rooms. At the time of the client’s surgery a nurse anesthetist administered the anesthesia. Unfortunately, she had a reaction. The nurse anesthetist improperly thought more anesthesia was needed and administered a more powerful sedative. The nurse was dead wrong. Our client was instead suffering from a cardiac problem and the nurse should have attempted to remove the anesthesia, rather than administer more. As a result of this Our firm successfully resolved this case for the maximum potential insurance policy limits of $500,000.00. In this case, a young girl that was a passenger in a car was tragically killed when the vehicle left the roadway and struck a tree. The driver was the only witness and testified that another vehicle had cut him off the roadway. An reconstruction engineer that was hired by our firm contradicted this. He testified that the defendant driver was speeding and lost control of his vehicle. The engineer expert based this on the damage to the vehicle, skid and scuff marks, and other engineering factors. Our firm Great Results in a Whiplash Case! (Insurance Co. offers $722.00 , Our Firm gets Client $35,000.00!) Substantial Worker Compensation Benefits after Insurance company denied case! Our firm was successful in litigating seven final hearings against Publix where our client was . The Defendant insurance company argued that our client was playing around with the machine while he was injured, doing “wheelies.” Despite this, we were still able to prove the elements of our case and ultimately prevailed, entitling our client to substantial from the vehicle in which our client was a passenger. Our law firm then went forward and was successful in obtaining a settlement of an additional $2,275,000.00 from the tractor trailer driver, who by contact forced the vehicle that hit our client head on, across the median. There were no witnesses to the initial impact between the vehicle that struck our client’s vehicle head-on and the tractor-trailer. Through expert testimony, our firm was able to show that the driver of the tractor-trailer was untruthful and as a result, we were able to collect the additional $2,275,000.00 from the driver.